Dear Automotive Clients: I found this article on Reuters today, Many interesting points--wanted to share with you!--Don

Honda set for record car sales, sees more growth
Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:39 AM ET
By Chang-Ran Kim, Asia auto correspondent (Reuters)

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan's Honda Motor Co. <7267.t> said on Tuesday it was heading for a 5 percent rise in global car sales to a record 3.55 million units this year and predicted continued growth in most regions for 2007.

Japan's no.3 auto maker, known for building fuel-efficient vehicles and power products, is enjoying runaway demand for the remodeled Civic sedan and CR-V crossover, keeping supply chronically short of orders, particularly in North America.

To alleviate the bottleneck, Honda will begin production of the CR-V at its plant in Mexico from the fall of 2007, Chief Executive Officer Takeo Fukui told a year-end news conference, adding the auto maker would also double annual capacity at its Brazilian car plant to 100,000 units by mid-2007.

The Tokyo-based car maker has already announced a slew of new factories and expansions over the past year, including plans for a car plant in Indiana to start operations in late 2008.

In the United States, its single-biggest market, Honda aims to increase sales by 3 percent to 1.56 million units in 2007, extending its record run to 11 straight years. Part of that will be fueled by an all-new Accord, which Honda said would hit North American showrooms next fall.

"Most customers around the world want value-for-money products, and in that sense we expect to sharpen our competitive edge and boost sales," Fukui said, playing down increasing competition from lower-cost South Korean and other brands.

Honda, the world's top motorcycle maker, also estimated its motorcycle sales to rise 3 percent to a record 12.7 million units this year, and power products to surge 15 percent to 6.4 million units.

Honda did not provide a global sales forecast for 2007, but said it expected its European car sales to jump 13 percent to 350,000 units, and sales in the Asia-Pacific region excluding Japan and China to also rise 13 percent, to 360,000 units.

In China, which most global car makers consider a strategically crucial market, Honda estimated its sales grew 23 percent this year to 320,000 units, short of the 350,000-unit target due to a delay in the sales network expansion at its smaller local joint venture, Dongfeng Honda.

For 2007, Executive Vice President Satoshi Aoki said Honda would aim for sales of around 400,000 units in China, outpacing his forecast for overall market growth of 10-15 percent.

To become more competitive, Honda said its main China joint venture, Ghuangzhou Honda, is looking at establishing a local automobile research and development center.

JAPAN MARKET TOUGH
Japanese auto makers are counting on sales expansion overseas to make up for tepid demand at home, where low-tax 660cc minivehicles are stealing all the growth.

Despite integrating its three sales channels into a single network this March, Honda estimated its domestic sales would fall 2 percent to 700,000 units this year, betraying the company's expectations for a rise.

Honda said it would aim to reverse that trend by launching a new seven-seater vehicle next spring, while developing more competitive minivehicles through its beefed-up collaboration with auto parts and minivehicle maker Yachiyo Industry Co. <7298.q>. Honda on Tuesday completed its purchase of more Yachiyo shares, boosting its stake to over half from 34.5 percent.

Fukui said Honda would also consider introducing in Japan a clean-diesel engine currently under development, after promising the powertrain for the U.S. market within three years.

Honda also said it would invest 25 billion yen ($212 million) to build a new engine plant in Saitama, north of Tokyo, with an annual production capacity of 200,000 units. The factory will employ about 500 people and supply Honda's car factories both inside and outside Japan.

Further out, Honda has said it wants to boost sales to 4.5 million cars and 18 million motorcycles in 2010 globally.

Shares in Honda have gained 27 percent in the year to date, outperforming the transport sector's <.ITEQP.T> 17 percent rise.

Banc of America this month named Honda its top pick in the autos sector for 2007, ahead of Toyota Motor Corp. <7203.t>, citing its upcoming new product pipeline, volume leverage and defensive nature.

After the news on Tuesday, Honda ended down 0.9 percent at 4,320 yen, in line with the main Nikkei average <.N225>.

($1=117.92 Yen)

(Additional reporting by Edwina Gibbs)

This service is not intended to encourage spam. The details provided by your colleague have been used for the sole purpose of facilitating this email communication and have not been retained by Reuters. Your personal details have not been added to any database or mailing list.
If you would like to receive news articles delivered to your email address, please subscribe at www.reuters.com

Again, Newspapers keep changing due to a shrinking audience. --Enjoy.. Don!

By William Spain Friday, Dec 15, 2006
Newspapers New Model Could Be PDF
Media LifeThe new model for newspapers could be a big departure from the one-size-fits-all, one edition per day, that is now standard practice. Instead, it could be a fully customized newspaper with a version for every possible need, in whatever format a reader might want. One new format is the PDF, which is emailed. While yet to catch on here, PDF editions are out in Canada, the UK and elsewhere. Publishers see real potential as the PDF is highly portable and easy to print on short notice. And at 8.5 inches x 11 inches, it fits easily into briefcases for reading during a commute. If a printout is lost, another can be done up quickly. For publishers, there's no real added cost for paper and ink and distribution, since it is delivered by email. And it offers yet another means of reaching readers and providing advertisers exposure. Read the whole story...

I found this on www.mediapost.com . Interesting Story for media folks like me... Have a great day. Don Mast...

By William Spain Friday, Dec 15, 2006
Cable Looks To Top Nets In Prime Time
MediaweekFor the fifth straight year, ad-supported cable looks to top the broadcast nets in prime time, grabbing a 55.4% household share year-to-date, way ahead of the six broadcast nets' 40.4%, according to Nielsen Media Research data crunched by Turner chief research officer Jack Wakshlag. But if cable's dominance of prime time continued in 2006, growth appears to be easing. If the 69 measured cable channels reach a projected 55.5 share by the end of this year, that represents growth of just one-tenth of 1% over 2005. But if cable's surge over the last five years--up 15.8% in the 18-49 demo as opposed to a drop of 16% for the nets--is easing back, that may be because prime time has reached saturation. Viewership in the daypart hasn't changed and is holding at an average of 7.5 hours per week per person. Read the whole story...

http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&art_aid=52620

Dear Mast Report Readers, This is a growing trend in advertising and communications--using TV and Internet to reach your customers... Try It!

Media Business
December 11, 2006

Capture Customers With Triangulation
Combine TV Spots With TV Station and Company Web Sites for Added Punch

By Adam Armbruster
Special to TelevisionWeek

Looking to stretch your television advertising budget in 2007? Then consider the proven power of a mixture of several media tools. Through the linking of television media choices in this way, you will enjoy improved profits and more specific campaign measurability, plus a higher sense of satisfaction with your campaign.

It is called "triangulation" and it is the powerful concept of "linking" your television commercial message, the Web site of the television station(s) with which you are advertising and your business Web site.

When these three media are properly triangulated, your campaign can become up to 50 percent more effective. It's got the power of television, plus the trackability of direct mail. It performs like television advertising on steroids.

To understand the importance of this concept, consider the following recent statistics:
According to the National Retail Federation, half of 2006 holiday shoppers will shop online (47.1 percent) and most (88.7 percent) also say they browse online before going to stores to shop. They'll begin by using a variety of search Web sites to begin their research and to compare products, among them Google (23.6 percent), Yahoo (7.2 percent), Amazon.com (5.5 percent) and eBay (3.7 percent).

We also know that they "preview" a business's Web site before visiting across all major spending categories: furniture stores (82 percent), auto dealers (78 percent to 91 percent) and homebuilders (90 percent).

See the trend? They shop virtually every major purchase online before even considering a store visit. This poses a big problem for advertisers: How to win over a consumer who won't even come into your store.

And here's a shocker: Buying search engine keyword ads is not the answer. This will not guarantee success. In our experience, keyword searches have not been proven to make mid-size or larger businesses successful in the long term. Keyword searches are far too vulnerable to being blunted by a competitor who can, and usually will, buy the same keywords against you. Many companies spend 30-plus percent of their marketing budget buying keyword searches, when these dollars could be used more efficiently to promote their business's Web site, thereby driving more "organic" traffic to the Web site. Google works on algorithms based on the popularity of a Web site.

So clearly the goal is to make your own Web site the destination for the consumer.
We know that new customers who were brought to a company through triangulated media have been on average a higher-quality lead, and therefore a more profitable lead. This could be attributed to the fact that these new consumers sought out and found your company based on a real personal need, versus a casual click-through from a Google ad.

So if you agree that the real goal is to get more consumers directly onto your Web site before they visit your business, we must begin to build our triangle.

Here are the three easy steps:

· Write and design your TV commercial to serve as a retail-driver and a Web-driver message. To do this you need to include the key proven elements for a successful television message and then add your Web site to the end of the message as the "closer." Forget listing addresses and phone numbers, since those should be readily available on your Web site anyway. Also, make the Web address prominent; many trendy producers are placing the Web address in a smaller font and placing it in the lower left- or right-hand corner of the screen. This is a mistake, as most viewers only "see" the middle of the television screen. When done right, significant new-customer Web contacts can occur.

Case in point: Recently a homebuilder client of ours reported that it is enjoying a sales pacing that is far superior to its local weakened housing marketplace thanks to its triangulated television and Internet media plan. Notably, its Web site exploded by 338 percent in local unique visitors when its newly designed TV commercial aired, thereby driving quality traffic to its business.

· Harness the power of local television station Web sites. These highly promoted Web sites are teeming with local customers who are worth far more to you than out-of-town traffic. However, think of local station Web sites as if they were actually a local newspaper: You need to design Web ads that are similar to print ads in a newspaper and not just logo ads.

This kind of ad can send a buyer around Google and directly to your Web site, thereby creating a faster route to you without the risk of the consumer encountering competitive Web messages.

· Optimize your own Web site to receive more local organic Web traffic by including the keywords, phrases, images and terms that are most often used by consumers to search the Internet. Also, the first page of your Web site must be what we call "retail-friendly," meaning that the consumer should not have to drill down to find out the basics of your business such as product offering, locations, phone numbers and the like. If the most exciting page on your Web site is still the "About Us" section, it's clearly time for a major overhaul.

Finally, the triangulation of these media must be activated. This is the process of linking the elements electronically so that a person driven to any Web element can "click over" to the next elements.

Consumers seeing your television commercial will instantly know where to go next online. If they miss your Web site address, they can go to the TV station site and find you there. Finally, by seeing your ad on the TV station Web site, they can instantly learn more about you on your own Web site by clicking the ad.

Planning a successful retail campaign incorporating true triangulation takes a little more time, but the steps are already proven to generate additional profit by connecting the media together for the benefit of the consumer.

As my mentor, Gerry Summers, once said: "Give the consumer what she wants, and she'll beat a path to your door." And these days, the front door she'll beat a path to is really your Web site.

Adam Armbruster is a partner in the Red Bank, N.J., retail and broadcasting consulting firm Eckstein, Summers, Armbruster and Co. He can be reached at adam@esacompany.com or 941-928-7192.

Additional sources: DM News (via MarketingVox), Home Builder Magazine, Ward's Dealer Business, Furniture Today.

Dear reader, I found this article and thought it was very interest. My goal is to I find research that will assist you in making the right decisions regarding advertising and communications revenues. Enjoy.--Don.

Newspapers are finding that their Web sites, like this one for the News & Observer in North Carolina, are producing more of their ad revenue.

Troubling ’07 Forecast for the Old-Line Media but Not for the Online

By STUART ELLIOTT
Published: NEW YORK TIMES December 5, 2006

THE first Monday in October is known in legal circles as the start of the Supreme Court term. Similarly, on Madison Avenue, the first Monday in December has become familiar as the kickoff of the advertising forecast season.

And yesterday a flood of forecasts indeed flowed from analysts and agencies, all generally pointing to a challenging year ahead for the traditional media along with substantial growth for all things online.

(For those wondering why early December brings the predictions, it is because two brokerage firms, Credit Suisse and UBS, have long held their annual media conferences in the first week of the month. Other firms schedule the release of their forecasts at the same time, to ride the coattails of the competing conferences.)

Most forecasters are predicting growth in ad spending in the United States next year of 2 to 5 percent over 2006. That would represent a decline from the rate of growth in ad spending this year compared with 2005, which is expected to finish in the range of 3 to 6 percent. But it is not bad considering that 2007 will be missing two major events that help administer a hypodermic to ad budgets in even-numbered years: Olympics and national elections.

“You normally see a real drop-off in a non-Olympics, non-election year,” said Robert J. Coen, senior vice president and forecasting director at Universal McCann in New York, who opened the UBS conference.

Rather, Mr. Coen said, he believed that more marketers next year would increase ad budgets as they decide to “start turning their attention back to long-term communications” from a focus on cost-cutting.

Still, reactions to the predictions for 2007 depend upon the perch from which they are considered. Those in the traditional media like television and newspapers will no doubt frown after hearing that most forecasters expect at best flat growth in ad spending for them.
Those who sell ads on Web sites, on the other hand, are likely to be beaming at the high double-digit percentage gains being predicted for them.

“The trend that will continue to affect the media universe in 2007 is the ongoing shift in advertising dollars from traditional media into nontraditional media, most notably the Internet,” Fitch Ratings concluded in an outlook report.

Television, radio and newspapers will “experience slow growth and ongoing audience declines,” according to the report, “and ad spending continues to follow consumer patterns.”

For instance, the Newspaper Association of America is predicting that spending for ads on the Web sites of newspapers will increase a robust 22 percent next year from 2006. But ad spending in the print editions of those newspapers in 2007 will be flat, the association is forecasting, pulled down by a decline in classified advertising and no growth in demand from national advertisers.

An analyst for Credit Suisse, Debra Schwartz, questioned in a report whether even the prediction for an anemic gain of 1.2 percent was “too optimistic.”

A forecast from the Morton-Groves Newspaper Newsletter, issued last week, may be pessimistic enough for her. The publication predicted that ad spending in newspapers next year will fall 2 percent from 2006, a bigger decline than the 1.8 percent it is forecasting for this year compared with 2005.

(For ad spending on newspaper Web sites, the newsletter predicted an increase in 2007 of 23.3 percent from this year, coming after a gain of 34 percent it is forecasting for 2006.)
James Conaghan, vice president for business analysis and research at the newspaper association, offered a reason for the upbeat outlook for newspaper Web sites.

In a test recently started by Google to sell advertisements that appear in the print versions of 50 major newspapers, “the ad volume placed in the newspapers in the first three weeks has exceeded Google’s expectation for the entire three months of the test,” Mr. Conaghan said at the UBS conference.

“The advertisers and the publishers are also satisfied with the results,” he added.
Gordon Borrell, chief executive at Borrell Associates, who spoke with Mr. Conaghan, suggested that “10 years out, many newspaper Web sites could be as large as the newspapers that spawned them” in terms of ad revenue.

In another striking example of the divergence in forecasts for the traditional and new media, Mr. Coen, whose agency is part of the McCann Worldgroup unit of the Interpublic Group of Companies, predicted that ad spending on the four largest national broadcast television networks would increase just 3 percent next year from 2006.

In contrast, ad spending by national advertisers on the Internet will grow five times as fast, at 15 percent, Mr. Coen said.

Mr. Coen does not include search engine marketing in his estimates for Internet ad spending, classifying it as more promotional in nature. Another forecaster who does include it within his online totals — Steve King, worldwide chief executive at ZenithOptimedia, part of the Publicis Groupe — offered a prediction that Internet ad spending next year would grow 29 percent from 2006.

By comparison, Mr. King offered forecasts for many traditional media for percentage gains in low single digits like 1.5 percent for local radio and 2 percent for newspapers.
In fact, Mr. King said, he expected online ad revenue to grow at “seven times the rate for traditional ad growth.”

Internet ad spending as a percentage of the total for all American media will reach 7.1 percent this year, Mr. King said. He predicts that it will hit 10.4 percent in 2009.

Mr. Coen, who offers forecasts twice a year, predicted that American ad spending in 2007 would total $298.8 billion, up 4.8 percent from $285.1 billion in 2006. That is a full percentage point lower than the 5.8 percent increase he predicted last June when he gave his initial forecast for 2007.

Mr. Coen’s total for 2006 represents an increase of 5.2 percent from 2005. By contrast, last June he forecast a gain of 5.6 percent. Twice before, in June and December 2005, he predicted an increase of 5.8 percent.

Mr. Coen attributed the decline largely to “the beleaguered local sector” of ad spending, “which hasn’t done very well in traditional media,” he said, because local advertisers “continue to cut to the bone.”

Also, “consolidations are killing things” locally, Mr. Coen said, referring to combinations of local department stores, pharmacies and hardware chains, which are reducing the ranks of potential advertisers.

That was demonstrated — painfully, if you own a local newspaper — in Mr. Conaghan’s presentation. In the third quarter, when Federated Department Stores replaced a host of local retail names with the Macy’s brand, he said, the company’s ad spending in newspapers fell about 14 percent from the same period a year ago.

The declines were even more pronounced in certain Macy’s regional markets, Mr. Conaghan said, citing decreases of 34 percent in the South, 39 percent in the Midwest and 42 percent in the West.

The great gap incollege TV watching Study:

Half of their vieiwing is untracked

By Samantha Melamed Aug 3, 2006

In their pursuit of the elusive young consumers, one of the gaps for advertisers has always been college kids and their use of media, in large part because their TV viewing was not tracked by Nielsen.

Somewhere, in dorm rooms or off-campus apartments or bars, a lot of college kids were watching TV. Just how many and how much they were watching was not known.
It turns out to be a sizable amount.

More than one-fifth of 18-34s are college students, and they do more than half of their TV watching outside of their parents' home. When that is included in 18-34 measures, the audience rises 15 percent.

The study, by Total-TV Audience Monitor, found that 54 percent of college student viewing takes place in venues not measured by Nielsen--those dorm rooms, off-campus apartments and bars--and that a third of all adults 18-34 who watch television in such venues in an average week watch no television at home.

Total-TV Audience Monitor conducted its research using a panel of 1,017 two- and four-year college students and graduate students. The panel tracked their viewing in diaries over the month of October 2005.

That sample group represents a significant population of young people: 22 percent of 18-34s are college students, or some 16.9 million Americans. And of that number, 74 percent live away from home during the school year, according to T-TAM.

"It's surprising how large the college student population actually is," says Lynnae Psaras, vice president at T-TAM. "I've always wondered how networks could talk about their 18-34-year-old audience and leave out so many viewers who are away at school."

In fact, T-TAM's report comes as Nielsen Media Research is preparing to include students' out of home viewing in ratings. According to a Nielsen spokesperson, a pilot study of college students' viewing confirms T-TAM's 15 percent out of home findings. But details as to the size and composition of Nielsen's upcoming college panel are uncertain as yet. Says the spokesperson: "The measurement that we're going to do is an extension of our in-home ratings, so if a panel household has a student in college, then we will include them."

Here are some other findings of the T-TAM study:
Male and female students watch at significantly different hours. Men are most likely to watch on weekends from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., while women are most likely to be watching any day from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m.

As to where they're watching, 46 percent of viewing takes place in permanent homes, 37 percent watch in off-campus housing, 16 percent watch at on-campus locations including dorms, and just 1 percent of TV viewing takes place in bars or restaurants.

Viewing also varies by place of residence. Students living on campus watch three hours less per week than those living off campus, according to the study. And on average, those who live on campus do only 1.32 hours, or 9 percent of their weekly viewing, in-home, while the rest of their viewing for now goes uncounted.

While students who live away from home watch less television than their counterparts, 81 percent have TV sets in their rooms, 68 percent have cable, 26 percent have digital cable and 9 percent have satellite television. Some 13 percent have digital video recorders.

The study also found that in the average 15-minute viewing span, the college audience was split between broadcast (48 percent) and ad-supported cable (46 percent) viewing. Pay cable, video on demand, public television and other content account for the other 6 percent.

Network series constitute 27 percent of students' viewing and were the top genre overall. Sports and sports-related programming was No. 2 at 18 percent overall but No. 1 for men. Syndicated programs was No. 3 at 13 percent, followed by movies (10 percent) and talk shows (9 percent).

Samantha Melamed is a staff writer for Media Life.

Study: Web is the No. 1 Media
By Candace Lombardi, Staff Writer, CNET News.com, News.comCNETJune 05, 2006

Web media is the dominant at-work media and No. 2 in the home, according to a new report from the Online Publishers Association.

The Web also ranked as the No. 1 daytime media.

A research project, conducted by Ball State University's Center for Media Design, tracked the media use of 350 people every 15 seconds. The subjects represented each gender, about equally, across three age groups: 18 to 34, 35 to 49 and 50-plus. The people were monitored by another person for approximately 13 hours, or 80 percent of their waking day.

"Someone actually came into their homes and workplaces and had a handheld computer, every 15 seconds registering their media consumption and life activities," Pam Horan, president of the Online Publishers Association (OPA), told CNET News.com.

According to Horan, this is the first type of study of its kind. Previously, consumers were monitored for media usage by phone survey or diary method.

Not surprisingly, newspaper use peaked in the morning; that print media was consumed by 17 percent of the subjects between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m. When this media was combined with Web consumption, the potential reach for advertisers climbed to 44 percent. During the same morning period, the number of consumers using magazines jumped from 7 percent to 39 percent, and from 44 percent to 62 percent for television.

"The point is that there is an incremental reach that someone can gain by putting together a multimedia campaign," Horan said.

A conservative estimate from the study says 17 percent of overall media is consumed via the Internet, and Horan notes that other researchers like Forrester have placed that number even higher.

The OPA-commissioned study also used census data to determine the spending habits of its 350 monitored subjects. Web dominant consumers' retail spending averaged $26,450, while the TV-dominant group's spending averaged $21,401.

Yet, studies have shown that only about 8 percent of advertising goes to the Internet, Horan said.

"I hear more and more from marketers that they have shifted their business to be more responsive and realign. There is an active movement by traditional advertisers to be able to explore platform strategies," Horan said. She believes that research studies are attracting the attention of advertisers and media buyers and may result in a faster shift in advertising dollars to match the actual statistics of consumer media usage.

Others agree.

In March, the Pew Internet and American Life Project published a report that found more than 50 million Americans per day in 2005 used the Web as their primary news source. It also noted that news gathering was the third most popular Internet activity. A research report released that same month from the Association of National Advertisers, in conjunction with Forrester Research, indicated that advertising money would likely follow those people.

Researchers conducting the OPA study also found a consistently direct correlation between offline referrals to Web sites and Web traffic. When PBS tells people they can find more info about the topic being discussed on PBS.org, people do go to that Web site. The same was found for print media referrals to online counterparts like the New York Times and NYTimes.com.
CNET Networks is a member of the Online Publishers Association. OPA's Eyes on the Internet 2006 Tour is sponsored by CBS Digital Media, CNET Networks, the New York Times Media Company and Reuters.com, among others.

Milestone: Cable Widens Lead in 18-49s

From Media Life, April 21, 2006By Kevin Downey

“Every year, more of the audience shifts from broadcast to cable, but recently cable has been picking up steam because of original programming, as opposed to the 1990s when it was due to coverage gains.” John Spiropoulos, V.P., MediaVest.

With just weeks to go before the upfront market breaks, the broadcast networks are facing yet more bad news: Their long dominance among adults 18-49 is all but over.For the first time, ad-supported cable can claim a larger share of the coveted 18-49 audience in primetime for the broadcast season through late March.

Further, broadcast’s prospects for reclaiming that lead in the last weeks of the season appear slight, all but ensuring cable’s first season win ever in the demographic.Much of cable’s rising share can be attributed to its own growth, as it commands increasing amounts of viewers’ attention.

But it also reflects the broadcast networks’ faltering on key nights. NBC’s 25 percent dip and CBS’s 7 percent decline on Thursdays this year, for example, have opened things up for cable on a night that was long the most powerful of the week for broadcast.

Cable’s share of the 18-49 audience is up to 42 percent for the period Sept. 19 through March 26, from 41 percent during the same timeframe last year. The six broadcast networks’ share dipped to 40 percent from 42 percent, according to an analysis of Nielsen Media Research data released last week by media buying agency MediaVest.

As a point of comparison, the networks claimed 46 percent of the 18-49 audience four years ago, when cable’s share was only 37 percent.To make matters worse, the broadcast networks aren’t likely to ever reclaim dominance in primetime, predicts John Spiropoulos, vice president and group research director at MediaVest.

“The number of cable networks out there that continue to grow is driving this,” he says. “This is not necessarily due to anything other than the fact that people are exercising their options in terms of expanding their viewing pool for the programs they are looking for.”

Cable’s share of the primetime audience has been steadily climbing for years. In fact, it has ranked No. 1 in households since the 2003-04 season.

In the past, cable’s growth largely reflected its growing penetration. As more subscribers signed on, ratings went up. But today, with cable and satellite penetration leveling off at about 85 percent, ratings are increasing simply because viewers in the 18-49 demographic increasingly prefer cable programs to network shows.

“Every year, more of the audience shifts from broadcast to cable, but recently cable has been picking up steam because of original programming, as opposed to the 1990s when it was due to coverage gains,” says Spiropoulos. “For cable to continue this kind of growth, it will become more dependent on the amount of money it invests in original programming.”

As a result, he says, the cable networks are touting a slew of original productions in this year’s upfront presentations.Cable’s lead in the 18-49 demographic this season has been exacerbated by the broadcast networks’ troubles, notably on Saturday and Thursday nights.

On Saturdays, the broadcast networks have essentially stopped programming in favor of putting costly productions on ad-rich weeknights. The broadcast networks’ aggregated rating on Saturdays so far this season is only a 7.2, compared to cable’s 16.1 rating.

Cable doesn’t yet have the lead on Thursday night, but its rating is growing as the broadcast networks are losing viewers. Cable’s 18-49 rating this season is a 14.4, up 6 percent, while the broadcast networks have a 17.6 rating, down 7 percent.

This trend began a few years back when NBC’s ratings tumbled after “Friends” went off the air.

Now, CBS is having problems on the night, says Spiropoulos.“Cable’s growth is not only on Saturday night, but it’s also on Monday and Thursday. Thursday is key,” he says. “That night is important for cable if they want to combat the broadcast networks. And in recent weeks, we’ve seen some pretty significant weakness with CBS’s lineup on that night.”

Super Bowl improves with final ratings

Most-watched in 10 years with 90.7 million

By Diego Vasquez Feb 7, 2006

The Pittsburgh Steelers won their first Super Bowl title since the 1970s, and ABC also made a bit of history: the most-watched Super Bowl game since 1996.

According to updated ratings released late yesterday, the game averaged a 41.6 household rating, up a half a point from last year’s 41.1 rating for the game between the New England Patriots and Philadelphia Eagles.

Early metered market ratings from 56 cities published yesterday by Media Life indicated that the game had slipped 3 percent year to year. But those don’t reflect the 210 total markets measured by Nielsen, nor do they reflect totally accurate time period data. It’s not uncommon for final ratings to flip for an event as big as the Super Bowl.

The game averaged 90.7 million total viewers, about 5 percent more than last year’s 86.1 million viewers. The 1996 Super Bowl averaged 94.1 million, the most in Super Bowl history.

The game got especially strong tune-in in Pittsburgh, which averaged a 57.1 household rating, and Seattle, which averaged a 55. The Steelers beat the Seahawks 21-10 in what many sportswriters described as a dull game, as Seattle never seriously threatened to score during the fourth quarter.

But positive buzz about the advertisements, as well as the somewhat close score, likely kept viewers tuning in.

Among adults 18-49, ABC's rating was up slightly over last year. The game averaged a 34.6 in that demo, up 4 percent over last year's 33.2 on Fox.

ABC easily finished first for the night among 18-49s, according to Nielsen overnights, with a 28.7 average rating and 57 share from 7-11 p.m. Fox was second at 2.1/4, CBS third at 1.6/3, NBC fourth at 1.3/3 and the WB fifth at 0.6/1. Ratings for Univision weren’t immediately available.

At 7 p.m. ABC led with a 32.3 rating among 18-49s for its coverage of Super Bowl XL. Fox was second that hour with a 1.4 for an hour of “Simpsons” repeats, NBC third with a 0.9 for “Dateline,” CBS fourth with a 0.7 for “60 Minutes” and WB fifth with a 0.4 for the first of three “Beauty and the Geek” repeats. ABC led again at 8 p.m. with a 31.8 average for its continued coverage of the Super Bowl.

Fox remained second with a 2.4 for repeats of “The Simpsons” and “Family Guy,” with CBS third with a 1.5 for a repeat of “Criminal Minds,” NBC fourth with a 0.8 for a “Crossing Jordan” rerun, and WB fifth with a 0.6 for another “Beauty and the Geek” repeat.

At 9 p.m. ABC led again with a 31.2 average for the Super Bowl. Fox held onto second place with a 2.4 rating for an hour of “Family Guy” repeats, with CBS third with a 2.0 for a repeat of “Cold Case,” NBC fourth with a 1.2 for another “Crossing Jordan” rerun and WB fifth with a 0.7 for its last repeat of “Beauty and the Geek.” During the 10 p.m. hour, ABC led once more with a 19.4 average rating for the end of its Super Bowl coverage and the beginning of “Grey’s Anatomy.”

NBC moved into second with a 2.4 for a repeat of “Law & Order: Criminal Intent” and CBS was third with a 2.2 for a repeat of “CSI: Miami.” Among households, ABC led the night with a 34.6 average rating and a 52 share. CBS was second at 4.1/6, NBC third at 3.5/5, Fox fourth at 2.7/4 and WB fifth at 0.9/1.